<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Philosophy Papers: Philosophy Essay Help, Term Paper Writing, Research Paper Tips</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.philosophy-papers.net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.philosophy-papers.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:58:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Advantages and/or Disadvantages of Being Single</title>
		<link>http://www.philosophy-papers.net/advantages-andor-disadvantages-of-being-single.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosophy-papers.net/advantages-andor-disadvantages-of-being-single.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Samples of Philosophy Papers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philosophy-papers.net/?p=294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you single by choice or by virtue of circumstances? Which phase of your life are you in? Have you seen the other side of the fence before being single? These aspects largely determine your outlook, whether you enjoy being without a partner or are deploring the fact that you are without one. Freedom is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you single by choice or by <strong>virtue of circumstances</strong>? Which phase of your life are you in?  Have you seen the other side of the fence before being single? These aspects largely determine your outlook, whether you enjoy <em>being without a partner</em> or are deploring the fact that you are without one.</p>
<p>Freedom is a reason to be single and happy. A married person is limited to a point on freedom because he or she always has a partner to consider. “What time are you coming home?” “Where are you going?” These are the questions that can be asked once you are married and they merit response. There are certain things that you can’t do as a married person in comparison to a single person. I really love the idea of marriage but until that special someone comes along I’ve made a decision to be happy as I am.</p>
<p><span id="more-294"></span></p>
<p>Some think that being both single and happy at the same time is hard. Contrary to popular belief, it’s quite possible. However, humans are innately designed to be loved, valued and appreciated by another person be it family or someone else. A person can choose to be single but over time not being with someone intimately or emotionally can become challenging.<br />
How can you be single and happy? When <strong>being single</strong> is a choice, you can independently make decisions that bring substance to your lifestyle. For instance, being single doesn’t mean that you should be sitting at home brooding or being embraced by <em>doomsday syndrome</em>.</p>
<p>In essence, you can’t depend on individuals to make you happy. Happiness comes from within and, therefore, it is your attitude that determines whether you are enjoying your status of being single or ruing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosophy-papers.net/advantages-andor-disadvantages-of-being-single.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Vice or Weakness Do You Find Most Offensive?</title>
		<link>http://www.philosophy-papers.net/what-vice-or-weakness-do-you-find-most-offensive.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosophy-papers.net/what-vice-or-weakness-do-you-find-most-offensive.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Samples of Philosophy Papers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philosophy-papers.net/?p=288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The vice or weakness that is most offensive to me is undermining others’ ideas. Teaching undergraduates gives me a particularly direct view of how students interact. When the semester begins, it is a matter of few classes to identify those students who would rather criticize and make barbed comments about their fellow students, rather than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <strong>vice or weakness</strong> that is most offensive to me is undermining others’ ideas.  Teaching undergraduates gives me a particularly direct view of how students interact. When the semester begins, it is a matter of few classes to identify those students who would rather criticize and make barbed comments about their fellow students, rather than communicate something positive.</p>
<p>Is this a vice? In my opinion, being ‘mean-spirited’ towards others in the class is a vice and a weakness. It reflects the true character of the student poking fun at others. Trying to be superior to others in an academic setting does undermine everyone’s efforts, including the professor’s efforts.</p>
<p><span id="more-288"></span></p>
<p>Being authentic and true to oneself, as well as supporting others work and studies is crucial in the <strong>process of writing and learning</strong>. When there are a few students who consistently undermine the <em>process of learning and discussion</em>, it is hurtful and counter-productive for everyone. I find that redirecting the tone and posturing of such students is a challenge. Some students have a bullying mentality, which is not acceptable in the college setting. It seems to me that this vice stems from years of cultural acceptance without restraint or corrective measures from those in charge of the student-body. My sense is that if they’re not reachable by means of ethical and logical measures, than I suggest that they withdraw from my class.</p>
<p>For some students, being asked to withdraw from class is sufficient pressure for them to modify their behavior. However, for many others, their inability to move beyond old behaviors and negative commentary either earns them a poor grade or obliges them to withdraw from my class. My hope is to <strong>motivate each student</strong> to achieve their academic goals and to do so without undermining others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosophy-papers.net/what-vice-or-weakness-do-you-find-most-offensive.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should Teenage Children of Divorced Parents Have the Right to Decide which Parent to Live with?</title>
		<link>http://www.philosophy-papers.net/should-teenage-children-of-divorced-parents-have-the-right-to-decide-which-parent-to-live-with.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosophy-papers.net/should-teenage-children-of-divorced-parents-have-the-right-to-decide-which-parent-to-live-with.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Samples of Philosophy Papers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philosophy-papers.net/?p=280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Sweetie, who do you love more – mommy or daddy?” As kids, most of us have been subjected to questions like that (in pure playfulness). While parents are eager to know who is more loved by the children then, the same question is conveniently bypassed at the time of parents getting a divorce. When parents [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Sweetie, who do you love more – mommy or daddy?” As kids, most of us have been subjected to questions like that (in pure playfulness). While parents are eager to know who is more loved by the children then, the same question is conveniently bypassed at the time of parents getting a divorce.</p>
<p>When parents go through a divorce, the fight to get custody of the children is often too exhausting and emotionally damaging to them. In a paper called “<em>Decision-making by Children</em>” published in 2008 it has been claimed that most kids in their teens develop their communication skills and personal preferences, while also beginning to make the <strong>financial decisions</strong> on their own. This clearly indicates that teenage children become intellectually independent, while still taking guidance from parents on certain aspects of their lives.</p>
<p><span id="more-280"></span></p>
<p>Thus, with the established intellectual and <em>decision-making capabilities</em> of teenage children, it can be concluded that they should be given the right to decide which parent to live with. Nevertheless, we have to consider the flip side as well. Granting teenage children the right to decide greatly increases the pressure on the kids. Not only is it heartbreaking for the children to see the marriage of their parents fall apart, add to that the weight of choosing one parent. We cannot forget the fact that kids in their teens are extremely delicate. With the existing <strong>peer pressure</strong>, pressure to excel academically and the raging hormones playing their wicked game, adding another problem to their lot seems unfair.</p>
<p>What can be concluded is that undoubtedly, children should get a say in deciding which parent to reside with; however, that should not be the only criterion of the decision. Other factors pertaining to the parents’ profile (emotional, financial, and intellectual) also need to be considered when granting the parent the custody of the children.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosophy-papers.net/should-teenage-children-of-divorced-parents-have-the-right-to-decide-which-parent-to-live-with.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If You Could Buy One Very Expensive Thing, What Would It Be?</title>
		<link>http://www.philosophy-papers.net/if-you-could-buy-one-very-expensive-thing-what-would-it-be.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosophy-papers.net/if-you-could-buy-one-very-expensive-thing-what-would-it-be.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 14:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Examples of Philosophy Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[essay on Expensive Thing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Expensive Thing dissertation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Expensive Thing essay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Expensive Thing paper writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Expensive Thing papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Expensive Thing research paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Expensive Thing term paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Expensive Thing thesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[write Expensive Thing essay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philosophy-papers.net/?p=278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You don’t have to be an art lover to appreciate the works of the old or modern masters of the canvas. The older pieces by artists like Picasso, Pollock, Dali and Van Gogh have fetched staggering sums at auctions. Most people would argue that their value rests on so much more than a price tag. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don’t have to be an art lover to appreciate the works of the old or modern masters of the canvas. The older pieces by artists like Picasso, Pollock, Dali and Van Gogh have fetched <strong>staggering sums</strong> at auctions. Most people would argue that their value rests on so much more than a <em>price tag</em>. This makes sense when you consider how some paintings reach people on an emotional level.</p>
<p>It is not easy to single out any one work of art, but A Wheatfield with Cypresses by Vincent van Gogh appeals to me on many levels. This masterpiece was <strong>privately sold</strong> for $57 million, which makes it one of the most <strong>expensive paintings</strong> ever sold. Van Gogh did three of them in all, featuring the same rolling clouds, cypress trees, and wheat stalks leaning in the wind.</p>
<p>The style features elements common to many of van Gogh’s works, but it is simply a beautiful piece of art. I think it would be quite fitting in any setting, from the Trump Plaza to my much more humble surroundings. In fact, I can’t think of a <strong>better place</strong> for a painting like that. Imagine it being admired and appreciated by people who are not necessarily wealthy or art connoisseurs. This piece of work might even have appealed to van Gogh himself, even if he hadn’t been the author, having come from a somewhat humble background. </p>
<p>A painting’s story is never done being told, which might partially explain their popularity. In a room full of people, each person can see something different in a piece of artwork. Fifty-seven <strong>million dollars</strong> is certainly a hefty price for just about anything, but if I could afford it, I would want that painting hanging on my wall. There are many expensive things, such as homes, cars and other items, but a beautiful work of art lasts forever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosophy-papers.net/if-you-could-buy-one-very-expensive-thing-what-would-it-be.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Essential Characteristics of a Good Parent</title>
		<link>http://www.philosophy-papers.net/essential-characteristics-of-a-good-parent.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.philosophy-papers.net/essential-characteristics-of-a-good-parent.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Samples of Philosophy Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[essay on good parents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good parents dissertation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good parents essay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good parents paper writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good parents papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good parents research paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good parents term paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good parents thesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[write good parents essay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philosophy-papers.net/?p=274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What Are the Essential Characteristics of a Good Parent? Many parents take interest in proper upbringing issues because it is a complicated task for today&#8217;s parents to bring up a well-adjusted, sociable, talented, and stable individual. We often ask ourselves if we are good parents and foster our children in a right way. Any comparison [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>What Are the Essential Characteristics of a Good Parent?</h3>
<p>Many parents take interest in proper upbringing issues because it is a complicated task for today&#8217;s parents to bring up a well-adjusted, sociable, talented, and stable individual. We often ask ourselves if we are<strong> good parents</strong> and foster our children in a right way. Any comparison is useless because every family has its own microclimate and life, belongs to a definite social group, has its specific spiritual values, inner relationships, lifestyle, traditions etc. Something that is good for one person may cause trouble to another.</p>
<p>Some parents bring up their kids by their intuition, and they&#8217;re right, since every pedagogical method is beyond any advice. It is very important to live in harmony with ourselves, only in this case we can help our children achieve inner harmony. <em>Good parents</em> don&#8217;t have to be perfect and follow stereotypes of <strong>&#8220;good parents&#8221;</strong> that are being promoted in a society. Psychologists and parents agree that even if there are no universal recommendations for a child’s upbringing, there are a few indisputable<em> rules for a good parent</em>:    </p>
<ul>
<li>never humiliate the child, especially in the presence of other people. It can essentially reduce self-esteem and influence immature psyche of a child;</li>
<li>always give the child the right to choose and to make mistakes as it will help develop his/her independence when making important decisions;</li>
<li>never scream at the child;</li>
<li>never compare the child with other children, otherwise, he or she can spend their life chasing after a non-existent ideal;</li>
<li>control one’s emotions when talking to the child, be logical and fair;</li>
<li>don&#8217;t suppress the child&#8217;s personality, help the child reveal it;</li>
<li>never use any pressure, treat the child as an equal at any age, find the time for communication with the child every day, take interest in his or her likes and dislikes; provide the child with a reasonable freedom that will help him gain confidence in life;</li>
<li>always show affection to the child, especially when you are dissatisfied with his or her behavior or actions, it is very important to make it clear that discontent was provoked by their behavior or an action, not the personality of the child as a whole;</li>
</ul>
<p>It is quite obvious that <em>being a good parent</em> is a lot of work. Your whole life may be needed to fulfill this mission. It is worth to remember that disobedience is a sign that you&#8217;re doing something wrong. Listen to your children, love them, and you will always be the<strong> best parents</strong> for them. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.philosophy-papers.net/essential-characteristics-of-a-good-parent.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

